Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameGP107GLCedar Trail
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 July 2017 (9 years ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684
Core clock speed1215 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1468 MHz400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6008 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P2000 Max-Q 32724
+3272300%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 July 2017 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

P2000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 170 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 Max-Q or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.