Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M5000 SE M6000 M6000 24 GB Tesla M40 Tesla M40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with Quadro P3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015, $4,200
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.10
+84.1%

M6000 outperforms P3000 Mobile by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.42no data
Power efficiency8.7015.74
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM200GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2015 (11 years ago)11 January 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721280
Core clock speed988 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate213.997.20
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS3.11 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs19280
L1 Cache1.1 MB480 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.26.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M6000 28.10
+84.1%
P3000 Mobile 15.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M6000 11706
+84.2%
Samples: 198
P3000 Mobile 6356
Samples: 347

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+71.9%
64
−71.9%
4K50−55
+78.6%
28
−78.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p38.18no data
4K84.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M6000 is 72% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 79% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.10 15.26
Recency 21 March 2015 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 84% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

P3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
UHD Graphics P630 Graphics P630
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GTX 980 GTX 980
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
HD 7570 OEM HD 7570 OEM
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
ATI HD 3690 HD 3690
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
7050 + nForce 630a GeForce 7050 + nForce 630a
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
HD 8330 Mobile IGP HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Arc Pro A30M Pro A30M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 158 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 202 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or Quadro P3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.