Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9050 9050 4 GB 9050 8 GB 9050 OEM 9060 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT LP

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015, $322
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.10
RX 9060 XT 16 GB
2025, $349
16 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
48.28
+580%

9060 XT 16 GB outperforms K1200 by a whopping 580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RX 9060 XT 16 GB RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60176
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1883.22
Power efficiency12.2123.34
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 6953% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed954 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06400.6
Floating-point processing power1.0578 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.10
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 48.28
+580%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2958
Samples: 786
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 20114
+580%
Samples: 8278

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−648%
157
+648%
1440p10−12
−600%
70
+600%
4K6−7
−617%
43
+617%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.33
−590%
2.22
+590%
1440p32.20
−546%
4.99
+546%
4K53.66
−561%
8.12
+561%
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 590% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 546% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 561% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 648% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 600% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 617% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.10 48.28
Recency 28 January 2015 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 160 Watt

Quadro K1200 has 256% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 580% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
RX 9060 XT 16 GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Quadro M4000 M4000
vs
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
Quadro M6000 M6000
vs
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile
Quadro K1200 K1200
vs
8800 GTX 8800 GTX
Quadro K1200 K1200
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
Quadro K1200 K1200
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
P102-100 P102 100
Quadro K420 K420
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB A800 PCIe 40 GB
Quadro K420 K420
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile RTX 5070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 139 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2025 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.