ION 2 vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with ION 2, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015, $4,200
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.00
+9233%

M6000 outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 9233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2361410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.42no data
Power efficiency8.731.17
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM200GT218S
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (11 years ago)3 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307216
Core clock speed988 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate213.93.800
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1928
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1653 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.21.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 1−2 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 1−2 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
Valorant 27−30 27−30

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 1−2 1−2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Dota 2 9−10 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 6−7
Valorant 27−30 27−30

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Dota 2 9−10 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 6−7
Valorant 27−30 27−30

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 2−3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 3−4

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 1−2

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 14−16
Valorant 5−6 5−6

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 1−2

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 2−3

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.00 0.30
Recency 21 March 2015 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 20 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 9233% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 30% more advanced lithography process.

ION 2, on the other hand, has 92% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while ION 2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 158 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 29 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or ION 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.