GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015, $4,200
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.10

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms M6000 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23188
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.42no data
Power efficiency8.7070.77
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGM200GB206
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (11 years ago)April 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724608
Core clock speed988 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate213.9205.2
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS13.13 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs192144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache1.1 MB4.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA5.212.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M6000 28.10
RTX 5070 Mobile 45.74
+62.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M6000 11706
Samples: 198
RTX 5070 Mobile 19057
+62.8%
Samples: 3148

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−72.3%
112
+72.3%
1440p35−40
−74.3%
61
+74.3%
4K24−27
−66.7%
40
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p64.62no data
1440p120.00no data
4K175.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 117
+0%
117
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 72% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 74% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.10 45.74
Recency 21 March 2015 on April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 158 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 549 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.