Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU vs Quadro FX 370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1457not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG98no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 August 2008 (17 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores840
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt

FX 370M has 125% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370M and M4 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate M4 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370M or M4 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.