Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1529not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG72no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 March 2006 (20 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores740
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed450 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

FX 350M has 200% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and M4 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate M4 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or M4 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.