RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1267not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.62no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 May 2006 (20 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed450 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors278 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs20160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length173 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt

FX 3500 has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500 or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.