GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs FirePro W6150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W6150M with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

W6150M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
5.66
RTX 3060 Ti
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
48.57
+758%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms W6150M by a whopping 758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66174
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.63
Power efficiencyno data18.79
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSaturnGA104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2015 (10 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684864
Core clock speed1075 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate51.60253.1
Floating-point processing power1.651 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs48152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38
L1 Cache192 KB4.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

W6150M 5.66
RTX 3060 Ti 48.57
+758%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W6150M 2358
Samples: 4
RTX 3060 Ti 20233
+758%
Samples: 33731

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−864%
135
+864%
1440p8−9
−825%
74
+825%
4K5−6
−860%
48
+860%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.39
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Palworld 186
+0%
186
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172
+0%
172
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 330
+0%
330
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200
+0%
200
+0%
Palworld 157
+0%
157
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+0%
196
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
Palworld 122
+0%
122
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+0%
185
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 274
+0%
274
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Palworld 109
+0%
109
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 82
+0%
82
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+0%
107
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
Palworld 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 44
+0%
44
+0%

This is how W6150M and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 864% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 825% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 860% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.66 48.57
Recency 12 November 2015 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Ti has a 758% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W6150M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19639 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W6150M or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.