Radeon 8065S vs L40S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared L40S with Radeon 8065S, including specs and performance data.

L40S
2022
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
47.99
+3.2%

L40S outperforms 8065S by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4565.79
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD102Gorgon Halo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 October 2022 (4 years ago)28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181762560
Core clock speed1110 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate1,431480.0
Floating-point processing power91.61 TFLOPSno data
ROPs19264
TMUs568160
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores14240
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cache17.8 MB1 MB
L2 Cache48 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

L40S 47.99
+3.2%
Radeon 8065S 46.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

L40S 20076
+3.2%
Samples: 9
Radeon 8065S 19456
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120 110−120
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120 110−120
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140 130−140

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 140−150 140−150
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 250−260 250−260
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 140−150 140−150
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150 140−150
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120 110−120
Metro Exodus 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190 180−190
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 140−150 140−150
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190 180−190

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105 100−105
Metro Exodus 70−75 70−75
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 55−60
Far Cry 5 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100 95−100

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130 120−130

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 110−120
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85 80−85
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 27−30
Far Cry 5 65−70 65−70
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 70−75

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.99 46.51
Recency 13 October 2022 28 September 2026
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 55 Watt

L40S has a 3% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8065S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 82% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between L40S and Radeon 8065S.

Be aware that L40S is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8065S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 45 votes

Rate L40S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about L40S or Radeon 8065S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.