Arc B390 vs Jetson Nano GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.76
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGM20BPanther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMarch 2019 (7 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281536
Core clock speed640 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology20 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate14.74120.0
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache48 KB768 KB
L2 Cache256 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.4
CUDA5.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 700% lower power consumption.

Arc B390, on the other hand, has a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and Arc B390. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano GPU or Arc B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.