Arc Pro B370 vs Arc B390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc B390 and Arc Pro B370, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc B390
2026
80 Watt
21.46

Pro B370 outperforms B390 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7467.82
ArchitectureXe3-LPG (2026)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code namePanther LakePanther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361280
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz2400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate120.096.00
Floating-point processing power7.68 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs2420
TMUs4840
Ray Tracing Cores1210
L1 Cache768 KB640 KB
L2 Cache16 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc B390 21.46
Arc Pro B370 21.93
+2.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc B390 8939
Samples: 468
Arc Pro B370 9134
+2.2%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
1440p36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
4K24
+0%
24−27
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry 5 87
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+3.3%
150−160
−3.3%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−1.6%
250−260
+1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry 5 79
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Forza Horizon 5 88
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+7%
100−105
−7%
Valorant 149
−0.7%
150−160
+0.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry 5 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+4%
150−160
−4%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Valorant 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Valorant 45
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

This is how Arc B390 and Arc Pro B370 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B390 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B390 is 3% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.46 21.93
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

Arc Pro B370 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 220% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc B390 and Arc Pro B370.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Arc Pro B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc B390 or Arc Pro B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.