GeForce 205 OEM vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameMach32GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)26 November 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed10 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.712
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLNone3.3
OpenCLNone1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 26 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 800 nm 40 nm

205 OEM has an age advantage of 16 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GeForce 205 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate GeForce 205 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or GeForce 205 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.