GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.37
Power efficiencyno data28.48
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMach32GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)2 February 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed10 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1470 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUsno data72
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s168.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 6 GB has an age advantage of 31 years, a 614300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3797 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.