UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1098
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.67
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGMA HDGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1224
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology45 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411
+1047%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 11 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 136 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.