Ice Lake GT3e vs GeForce 9100M G
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1474 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) |
| GPU code name | MCP77MH MCP79MH | Ice Lake GT3e |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (18 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 32 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Ice Lake GT3e has a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and Ice Lake GT3e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9100M G is a notebook graphics card while Ice Lake GT3e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
