RTX A1000 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.
RTX A1000 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 507 | 253 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 39.70 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023−2025) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | GA107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 727 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 1462 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 105.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 72 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 18 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 163 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 25
−160%
| 65−70
+160%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−131%
|
30−33
+131%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
−163%
|
50−55
+163%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−156%
|
110−120
+156%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
−145%
|
27−30
+145%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−166%
|
85−90
+166%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50
−160%
|
130−140
+160%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−158%
|
240−250
+158%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−156%
|
110−120
+156%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−131%
|
30−33
+131%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
−150%
|
60−65
+150%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−159%
|
150−160
+159%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 39
−156%
|
100−105
+156%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−163%
|
50−55
+163%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 22
−150%
|
55−60
+150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−160%
|
65−70
+160%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−158%
|
240−250
+158%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−156%
|
110−120
+156%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−150%
|
130−140
+150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−166%
|
85−90
+166%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−159%
|
150−160
+159%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30
−150%
|
75−80
+150%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
−163%
|
50−55
+163%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−158%
|
240−250
+158%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−157%
|
190−200
+157%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−131%
|
30−33
+131%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−145%
|
27−30
+145%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−160%
|
130−140
+160%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−150%
|
60−65
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−131%
|
30−33
+131%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
−140%
|
24−27
+140%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−131%
|
30−33
+131%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
−165%
|
260−270
+165%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−145%
|
27−30
+145%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−150%
|
30−33
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−140%
|
24−27
+140%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−150%
|
110−120
+150%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:
- RTX A1000 is 160% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.64 | 25.66 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 16 April 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 60% more advanced lithography process.
RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 166% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.
The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.
Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
