Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3090 with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3090
2020, $1,499
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
63.27
PRO W7900
2023, $3,999
48 GB GDDR6, 295 Watt
66.18
+4.6%

PRO W7900 outperforms RTX 3090 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3927
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.667.43
Power efficiency14.0817.47
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (6 years ago)26 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 3090 has 138% better value for money than PRO W7900.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores104966144
Core clock speed1395 MHz1760 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate556.0958.1
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112192
TMUs328384
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores8296
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cache10.3 MB3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length336 mm280 mm
Width3-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3090 63.27
PRO W7900 66.18
+4.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 26470
Samples: 17975
PRO W7900 27689
+4.6%
Samples: 86

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD187190−200
+1.6%
1440p120120−130
+0%
4K81
+1.3%
80−85

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.02
+61.9%
21.05
1440p12.49
+62.5%
33.33
4K18.51
+63%
49.99
  • RTX 3090 has 62% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 has 63% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 has 63% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 331
+10.3%
300−310
Counter-Strike 2 349 350−400
+0.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 209 210−220
+0.5%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 262 270−280
+3.1%
Battlefield 5 172
+1.2%
170−180
Counter-Strike 2 347 350−400
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 178 180−190
+1.1%
Far Cry 5 208 210−220
+1%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 254 260−270
+2.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
Valorant 350−400
+6.6%
350−400

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 156 160−170
+2.6%
Battlefield 5 158 160−170
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 309
+3%
300−310
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 290−300
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 154 160−170
+3.9%
Dota 2 217 220−230
+1.4%
Far Cry 5 196 200−210
+2%
Far Cry 6 169 170−180
+0.6%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 247 250−260
+1.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 171
+0.6%
170−180
Metro Exodus 176 180−190
+2.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 369
+5.4%
350−400
Valorant 350−400
+6.6%
350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 146 150−160
+2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 136 140−150
+2.9%
Dota 2 213 220−230
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 183 190−200
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 217 220−230
+1.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182 190−200
+4.4%
Valorant 296 300−310
+1.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 231 240−250
+3.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 500−550
+0.2%
Far Cry 6 133
+2.3%
130−140
Grand Theft Auto V 150 150−160
Metro Exodus 115 120−130
+4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 400−450 450−500
+0.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 93 95−100
+2.2%
Far Cry 5 171
+0.6%
170−180
Forza Horizon 4 197 200−210
+1.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 153 160−170
+4.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0.7%
150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 55−60 60−65
+3.4%
Counter-Strike 2 59 60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 6 84 85−90
+1.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 182 190−200
+4.4%
Metro Exodus 76
+1.3%
75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154 160−170
+3.9%
Valorant 300−350
+6%
300−310

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 113
+2.7%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 90−95
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+2.2%
45−50
Dota 2 202 210−220
+4%
Far Cry 5 108 110−120
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 153 160−170
+4.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 100−105
+4.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 80−85
+1.3%

This is how RTX 3090 and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 1% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.27 66.18
Recency 1 September 2020 26 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 295 Watt

PRO W7900 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon PRO W7900.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 80419 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 90 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3090 or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.