Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
21.90

9060 XT LP outperforms RTX 3050 Mobile by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29799
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Power efficiency22.6024.08
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (5 years ago)17 December 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed712 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1057 MHz3050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate67.65390.4
Floating-point processing power4.329 TFLOPS24.99 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs64128
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores1632
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache2 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 Mobile 21.90
RX 9060 XT LP 43.56
+98.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
Samples: 4
RX 9060 XT LP 18147
+98.9%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
−93.5%
180−190
+93.5%
1440p51
−96.1%
100−110
+96.1%
4K32
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 127
−96.9%
250−260
+96.9%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−98.4%
250−260
+98.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
−98.1%
210−220
+98.1%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 99
−91.9%
190−200
+91.9%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−98.4%
250−260
+98.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−92.8%
160−170
+92.8%
Far Cry 5 118
−94.9%
230−240
+94.9%
Fortnite 110−120
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%
Forza Horizon 5 108
−94.4%
210−220
+94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−95.4%
170−180
+95.4%
Valorant 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 57
−93%
110−120
+93%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−98.4%
250−260
+98.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−80.7%
450−500
+80.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−96.7%
120−130
+96.7%
Dota 2 169
−77.5%
300−310
+77.5%
Far Cry 5 107
−96.3%
210−220
+96.3%
Fortnite 110−120
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%
Forza Horizon 5 94
−91.5%
180−190
+91.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
−95.3%
250−260
+95.3%
Metro Exodus 62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−95.4%
170−180
+95.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
−78.6%
300−310
+78.6%
Valorant 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−96.7%
120−130
+96.7%
Dota 2 155
−93.5%
300−310
+93.5%
Far Cry 5 99
−91.9%
190−200
+91.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−95.4%
170−180
+95.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−84.6%
120−130
+84.6%
Valorant 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−88.7%
300−310
+88.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−93%
110−120
+93%
Metro Exodus 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
Valorant 180−190
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 68
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−93%
110−120
+93%
Metro Exodus 23
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Valorant 120−130
−96.7%
240−250
+96.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Dota 2 93
−93.5%
180−190
+93.5%
Far Cry 5 35
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and RX 9060 XT LP compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT LP is 94% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT LP is 96% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT LP is 88% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.90 43.56
Recency 11 May 2021 17 December 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 140 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has 87% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT LP, on the other hand, has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5662 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile or Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.