Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce Go 7800

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7800 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Go 7800
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.27
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
24.84
+9100%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Go 7800 by a whopping 9100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1426257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.6054.90
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG70AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 March 2006 (20 years ago)26 February 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores222048
Core clock speed400 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors302 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Palworld 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
Valorant 24−27
−9100%
2300−2350
+9100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−8746%
1150−1200
+8746%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Palworld 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9100%
2300−2350
+9100%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9100%
2300−2350
+9100%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8900%
1350−1400
+8900%
Valorant 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 24.84
Recency 3 March 2006 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 9100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 55 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7800 or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.