Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.29no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNV41Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 February 2005 (21 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores178192
Core clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate5.400230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs12256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 500 Watt

Go 6800 Ultra has 462% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.