GeForce 210 PCI vs GTX 765M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking497not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.89no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameno dataGT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (13 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616
Core clock speed850 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 31 Watt

GTX 765M SLI has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

210 PCI, on the other hand, has 319% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 86 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.