GeForce 210 PCI vs GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.61no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK106GT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed628 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate42.053.800
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs648
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.01.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 31 Watt

GTX 760A has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

210 PCI, on the other hand, has 77% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 86 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.