Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 275
2009, $249
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.21
RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.65
+1945%

7900 GRE outperforms GTX 275 by a whopping 1945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3170.89
Power efficiency1.1419.67
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 January 2009 (17 years ago)27 July 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7900 GRE has 22768% better value for money than GTX 275.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2405120
Core clock speed633 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2245 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt260 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.64718.4
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs28160
TMUs80320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache224 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm276 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB16 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 275 3.21
RX 7900 GRE 65.65
+1945%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 275 1344
Samples: 811
RX 7900 GRE 27464
+1943%
Samples: 2207

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12206
+1960%
1440p6−7
−95.3%
129
4K3−477
+2467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.902.67
+89.3%
1440p41.504.26
+89.7%
4K83.007.13
+91.4%
  • RX 7900 GRE has 89% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE has 90% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE has 91% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 208 208
Hogwarts Legacy 179 179
Resident Evil 4 Remake 234 234

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 184 184
Far Cry 5 174 174
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 260−270
Hogwarts Legacy 157 157
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 158 158
Far Cry 5 168 168
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 260−270
Grand Theft Auto V 164 164
Hogwarts Legacy 131 131
Metro Exodus 179 179
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382 382
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 148 148
Far Cry 5 155 155
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 260−270
Hogwarts Legacy 109 109
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209 209
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 130 130
Metro Exodus 111 111
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 98 98
Far Cry 5 154 154
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
Hogwarts Legacy 86 86
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156 156

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Grand Theft Auto V 151 151
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 50−55
Metro Exodus 71 71
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125 125
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 45 45
Far Cry 5 107 107
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
Hogwarts Legacy 49 49
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how GTX 275 and RX 7900 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 1960% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 2050% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 2467% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.21 65.65
Recency 15 January 2009 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 275 has 16% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has a 1945% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1729% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 91% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 144 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1251 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 or Radeon RX 7900 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.