Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated28
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.21
Power efficiencyno data19.61
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 July 2008 (18 years ago)27 July 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed576 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2245 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate36.86718.4
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs28160
TMUs64320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache224 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm276 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB16 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2008 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 260 Rev. 2 has 43% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1729% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 14 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1250 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or Radeon RX 7900 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.