GeForce 705M vs GTX 1080 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 Mobile 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 Max-Q 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Max-Q 1060 Mobile 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 1070 Mobile 1070 Max-Q 1070 SLI Mobile 1080 Mobile 1080 Max-Q 1080 SLI Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410M 610 610M 705A 705M 800A GT 520MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q and GeForce 705M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5X, 150 Watt
24.50
+2148%

1080 Max-Q outperforms 705M by a whopping 2148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2601142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.645.62
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF119
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)27 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256048
Core clock speed1290 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate234.93.800
Floating-point processing power7.516 TFLOPS0.0912 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1608
L1 Cache960 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
G-SYNC support+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 24.50
+2148%
GeForce 705M 1.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 10207
+2143%
Samples: 216
GeForce 705M 455
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102
+2450%
4−5
−2450%
1440p66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
4K50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+2233%
6−7
−2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Palworld 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 133 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+2233%
6−7
−2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Far Cry 5 91
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Fortnite 188
+9300%
2−3
−9300%
Forza Horizon 4 124
+1671%
7−8
−1671%
Palworld 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 111
+1133%
9−10
−1133%
Valorant 160−170
+445%
30−35
−445%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 121 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+2233%
6−7
−2233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+900%
24−27
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Dota 2 106
+607%
14−16
−607%
Far Cry 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Fortnite 127
+6250%
2−3
−6250%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+1643%
7−8
−1643%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+2250%
4−5
−2250%
Metro Exodus 64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Palworld 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%
Valorant 203
+555%
30−35
−555%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 108 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Dota 2 102
+580%
14−16
−580%
Far Cry 5 85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80
+789%
9−10
−789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+814%
7−8
−814%
Valorant 128
+313%
30−35
−313%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 109
+5350%
2−3
−5350%
Palworld 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+2429%
7−8
−2429%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Metro Exodus 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1491%
10−12
−1491%
Valorant 194
+6367%
3−4
−6367%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 82
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 66 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 84
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Palworld 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+327%
14−16
−327%
Metro Exodus 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Palworld 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Valorant 185
+2543%
7−8
−2543%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 80−85
+2600%
3−4
−2600%
Far Cry 5 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 34
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Palworld 21−24 0−1

This is how GTX 1080 Max-Q and GeForce 705M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 2450% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 3200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 2400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1080 Max-Q is 9300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Max-Q surpassed GeForce 705M in all 41 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.50 1.09
Recency 27 June 2017 27 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1080 Max-Q has a 2148% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 705M, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
8800 GTS 512 8800 GTS 512
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
8800 Ultra 8800 Ultra
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
NVS 280 PCI 280 PCI
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
Graphics 384SP 384SP
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
HD 6310 6310
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
7300 GT Mac Edition 7300 GT Mac Edition
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
FX 3000G 3000G
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA 1080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4060 Ti AD104 4060 Ti AD104
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA 1080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5050 5050

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce 705M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q or GeForce 705M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.