Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Radeon RX 7650 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
7650 GRE outperforms 1070 SLI by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 149 | 103 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 92.99 |
| Power efficiency | 9.47 | 20.19 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | Navi 33 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (10 years ago) | February 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $279 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 2695 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 13,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 345.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 22.08 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 32 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 204 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 288.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 118 | 130−140
+10.2%
|
| 4K | 56 | 65−70
+16.1%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 2.15 |
| 4K | no data | 4.29 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 110−120 | 130−140
+17.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 240−250
+17.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | 100−105
+16.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 110−120 | 130−140
+17.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130 | 150−160
+16.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 240−250
+17.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | 100−105
+16.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
| Fortnite | 280 | 300−310
+7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | 160−170
+11.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150 | 170−180
+15.6%
|
| Valorant | 220−230 | 260−270
+16.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 110−120 | 130−140
+17.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130 | 150−160
+16.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 240−250
+17.1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | 300−310
+7.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | 100−105
+16.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150 | 160−170
+11.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
| Far Cry 6 | 100−110 | 120−130
+11.1%
|
| Fortnite | 176 | 200−210
+13.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | 160−170
+11.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 87 | 100−105
+14.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 85−90 | 100−105
+13.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150 | 170−180
+15.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 111 | 130−140
+17.1%
|
| Valorant | 220−230 | 260−270
+16.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130 | 150−160
+16.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | 100−105
+16.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150 | 160−170
+11.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120 | 130−140
+9.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | 160−170
+11.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150 | 170−180
+15.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 73 | 85−90
+16.4%
|
| Valorant | 220−230 | 260−270
+16.1%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 123 | 140−150
+13.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95 | 100−105
+8.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260 | 300−310
+15.8%
|
| Far Cry 6 | 65−70 | 75−80
+10.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 75−80 | 85−90
+11.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55 | 60−65
+11.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | 200−210
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 250−260 | 300−310
+16.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | 110−120
+14.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45 | 45−50
+7.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95 | 100−105
+11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | 120−130
+15.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75 | 80−85
+14.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100 | 110−120
+13.4%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 30−33 | 35−40
+16.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 50−55
+16.3%
|
| Far Cry 6 | 27−30 | 30−33
+7.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 81 | 90−95
+11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 54 | 60−65
+11.1%
|
| Valorant | 220−230 | 260−270
+15%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 65−70
+10.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 50−55
+16.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20 | 21−24
+10.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110 | 120−130
+11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | 55−60
+14.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70 | 80−85
+15.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | 55−60
+12.2%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 38 | 40−45
+5.3%
|
This is how GTX 1070 SLI and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:
- RX 7650 GRE is 10% faster in 1080p
- RX 7650 GRE is 16% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.49 | 42.77 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 165 Watt |
RX 7650 GRE has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 45% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
