P106-090 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15

P106-090 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 4193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1503629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.64
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG98GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)31 July 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speed640 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point processing powerno data2.352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
P106-090 6.44
+4193%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117
P106-090 2684
+4229%
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Palworld 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 24−27
−4067%
1000−1050
+4067%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−3991%
450−500
+3991%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Palworld 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4100%
210−220
+4100%
Valorant 24−27
−4067%
1000−1050
+4067%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4100%
210−220
+4100%
Valorant 24−27
−4067%
1000−1050
+4067%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3900%
600−650
+3900%
Valorant 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 6.44
Recency 1 September 2009 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm

P106-090 has a 4193% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 72 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.