GeForce2 MX 400 vs GeForce G 103M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG98NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)3 March 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed640 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.07.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

G 103M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G 103M and GeForce2 MX 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 155 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or GeForce2 MX 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.