GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs FX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX 5500 with GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 5500
2004, $37
64 MB DDR
0.02
RTX 5090 Mobile
2025
24 GB GDDR7, 95 Watt
67.92
+339500%

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms FX 5500 by a whopping 339500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data55.31
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV34 B1GB203
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2004 (22 years ago)27 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10496
Core clock speed270 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors45 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate1.080496.9
Floating-point processing powerno data31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cacheno data10.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount64 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5500 0.02
RTX 5090 Mobile 67.92
+339500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5500 8
Samples: 178
RTX 5090 Mobile 28298
+353625%
Samples: 1336

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1160
1440p-0−1103
4K-0−164

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 390
+0%
390
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 301
+0%
301
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 404
+0%
404
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 224
+0%
224
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 158
+0%
158
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 189
+0%
189
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.02 67.92
Recency 17 March 2004 27 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 5090 Mobile has a 339500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5500 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 177 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 355 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5500 or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.