GeForce GTS 150M vs 7600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7300 GT 7300 GT AGP 7300 GT Mac Edition 7600 GS 7600 GT 7600 GT AGP 7600 LE 7650 GS
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GTS 9800S GTS 150M GTS 160M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7600 GT with GeForce GTS 150M, including specs and performance data.

7600 GT
2006, $199
256 MB GDDR3, 40 Watt
0.56

GTS 150M outperforms 7600 GT by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
7600 GT 7600 GT
GTS 150M GTS 150M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12921106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.082.08
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG73G94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 March 2006 (20 years ago)3 March 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed560 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors177 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate6.72012.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.128 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data192
ROPs816
TMUs1232
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-2-way
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHzUp to 800 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s51 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

7600 GT 0.56
GTS 150M 1.21
+116%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7600 GT 234
Samples: 441
GTS 150M 504
+115%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.56 1.21
Recency 9 March 2006 3 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 45 Watt

7600 GT has 13% lower power consumption.

GTS 150M, on the other hand, has a 116% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTS 150M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7600 GT is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTS 150M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
vs
ATI HD 4550 Radeon HD 4550
GTS 150M GeForce GTS 150M
vs
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
8600 GT 8600 GT
vs
GTX 745 OEM GTX 745 OEM
8600 GT 8600 GT
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 2
8600 GT 8600 GT
vs
RX 640 RX 640
8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS 640
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
7900 GS 7900 GS
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce 6800 6800
vs
Radeon 780M 780M
GeForce 6200 6200
vs
9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 6600 6600
vs
9300 SE 9300 SE
6600 GT 6600 GT
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X
FX 5500 FX 5500
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile RTX 5090 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 190 votes

Rate GeForce 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7600 GT or GeForce GTS 150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.