GRID A100A vs GeForce 930A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking831not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.85no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM108GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846912
Core clock speed928 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed941 MHz1005 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate22.58434.2
Floating-point processing power0.7227 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache192 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s1,866 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.08.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 400 Watt

GeForce 930A has 1112% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 930A and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 930A is a notebook graphics card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce 930A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930A or GRID A100A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.