GRID A100A vs GeForce 920MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking883not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.28no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM108GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 March 2016 (10 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2566912
Core clock speed965 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHz1005 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate23.83434.2
Floating-point processing power0.5084 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache128 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,866 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 March 2016 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 400 Watt

GeForce 920MX has 2400% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920MX and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920MX is a notebook graphics card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1200 votes

Rate GeForce 920MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920MX or GRID A100A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.