GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs 7150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7150M and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms 7150M by a whopping 82675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1568 | 181 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.30 |
| Architecture | no data | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | C67 | TU104B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) | 2 April 2020 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 220.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 7.066 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 119 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 78 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 45 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 95−100 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 95−100 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−6400%
|
130−140
+6400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1814%
|
130−140
+1814%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 95−100 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−2978%
|
270−280
+2978%
|
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−1757%
|
130
+1757%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−6400%
|
130−140
+6400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1814%
|
130−140
+1814%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−3160%
|
163
+3160%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−1671%
|
124
+1671%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−6400%
|
130−140
+6400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1814%
|
130−140
+1814%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1640%
|
87
+1640%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−527%
|
163
+527%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−7900%
|
80−85
+7900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 170−180 |
1440p
Ultra
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−5900%
|
60−65
+5900%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−400%
|
70−75
+400%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−4950%
|
200−210
+4950%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−4000%
|
40−45
+4000%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−4700%
|
48
+4700%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 166
+0%
|
166
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 164
+0%
|
164
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 152
+0%
|
152
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 156
+0%
|
156
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 129
+0%
|
129
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 141
+0%
|
141
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 105
+0%
|
105
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 129
+0%
|
129
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 54
+0%
|
54
+0%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110
+0%
|
110
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 93
+0%
|
93
+0%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 32
+0%
|
32
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 7900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2070 Super Mobile performs better in 20 tests (34%)
- there's a draw in 38 tests (66%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.04 | 33.11 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 2 April 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 82675% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
