GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs 7000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7000M with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7000M
2006
0.03
RTX 3060 Ti
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
48.57
+161800%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms 7000M by a whopping 161800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking156974
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.61
Power efficiencyno data18.79
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC67GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores34864
Core clock speed1 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data253.1
Floating-point processing powerno data16.2 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38
L1 Cacheno data4.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 7000M 0.03
RTX 3060 Ti 48.57
+161800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7000M 13
Samples: 2
RTX 3060 Ti 20233
+155538%
Samples: 33753

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1135
1440p-0−174
4K-0−148

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.39
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
−9200%
186
+9200%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−9900%
200
+9900%
Palworld 2−3
−7750%
157
+7750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2357%
170−180
+2357%
Valorant 21−24
−1078%
270−280
+1078%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2989%
270−280
+2989%
Dota 2 7−8
−1971%
145
+1971%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−9700%
196
+9700%
Palworld 2−3
−6000%
122
+6000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2357%
170−180
+2357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3600%
185
+3600%
Valorant 21−24
−1078%
270−280
+1078%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−1829%
135
+1829%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8550%
173
+8550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2357%
170−180
+2357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
Valorant 21−24
−1091%
274
+1091%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−14500%
146
+14500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−10300%
100−110
+10300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−613%
107
+613%
Valorant 4−5
−7200%
290−300
+7200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172
+0%
172
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 330
+0%
330
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 82
+0%
82
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
Palworld 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 44
+0%
44
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 14500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti performs better in 24 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.03 48.57
Recency 1 February 2006 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Ti has a 161800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7000M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19639 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7000M or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.