Arc B390 vs FirePro W9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W9000 with Arc B390, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W9000
2012, $3,999
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
14.55

B390 outperforms W9000 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.39no data
Power efficiency4.1420.92
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameTahitiPanther Lake-H
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 June 2012 (14 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed975 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8120.0
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3224
TMUs12848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache768 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1375 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth264 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W9000 14.55
Arc B390 21.47
+47.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W9000 6098
Samples: 19
Arc B390 9002
+47.6%
Samples: 613

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−4057
+62.9%
1440p24−2736
+50%
4K16−1824
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p114.26no data
1440p166.63no data
4K249.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 40−45
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 50−55

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 87 87
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
Valorant 150−160 150−160

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 27 27
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 240−250
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 79 79
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 71 71
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 40−45
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 103
Valorant 149 149

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 73 73
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 46

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 41 41
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 150−160
Grand Theft Auto V 31 31
Metro Exodus 27−30 27−30
Valorant 96 96

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 21−24
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−35

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 50−55

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18 18
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 40−45
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−35
Valorant 45 45

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 9−10
Far Cry 5 24−27 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 21−24

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 21−24

This is how FirePro W9000 and Arc B390 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B390 is 63% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B390 is 50% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B390 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.55 21.47
Recency 14 June 2012 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 80 Watt

Arc B390 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 89% more advanced lithography process, and 77% lower power consumption.

The Arc B390 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W9000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate FirePro W9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9000 or Arc B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.