Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs FirePro W7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
S7150 S7150 x2 W2100 W4100 W4300 W5000 W5100 W7000 W7100 W8100 W9000 W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 400 Watt
13.91
+61.7%

W7100 outperforms Graphics G7 96EUs by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1823.77
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTongaTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (12 years ago)15 August 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed920 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate103.0no data
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+53.8%
26
−53.8%
1440p24−27
+60%
15
−60%
4K18−20
+50%
12
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 124
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 12
+0%
12
+0%
Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Fortnite 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 15
+0%
15
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
+0%
8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how FirePro W7100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W7100 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W7100 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro W7100 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.91 8.60
Recency 12 August 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 28 Watt

FirePro W7100 has a 62% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1329% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7100 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
ATI X800 CrossFire Edition Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
7100 GS GeForce 7100 GS
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
P106-100 P106 100
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
GTX 750 GM206 GeForce GTX 750 GM206
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
FirePro S9050 FirePro S9050
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
FirePro S9150 FirePro S9150
vs
ATI DDR VIVO Radeon DDR VIVO
FirePro S9150 FirePro S9150
vs
RTX A6000 Quadro RTX A6000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 83 votes

Rate FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1179 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7100 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.