FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs with FirePro W4300, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
8.60
+23.7%

Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms W4300 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.7710.76
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeBonaire
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (6 years ago)1 December 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speed400 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.64
Floating-point processing powerno data1.428 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data171 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
1440p15
+25%
12−14
−25%
4K12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Fortnite 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Valorant 124
+24%
100−105
−24%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+28%
75−80
−28%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Dota 2 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Far Cry 5 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Fortnite 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Valorant 112
+24.4%
90−95
−24.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Dota 2 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Far Cry 5 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 15
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Valorant 85−90
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Valorant 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and FirePro W4300 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 24% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 25% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.60 6.95
Recency 15 August 2020 1 December 2015
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 24% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 79% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W4300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1179 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or FirePro W4300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.