GeForce RTX 5090 vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V7900 with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V7900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.41
RTX 5090
2025, $1,999
32 GB GDDR7, 575 Watt
93.13
+1621%

RTX 5090 outperforms V7900 by a whopping 1621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6792
Place by popularitynot in top-1008
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.90
Power efficiency2.8112.62
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameCaymanGB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (15 years ago)30 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128021760
Core clock speed725 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate58.001,636.8
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs80680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170
L1 Cache320 KB21.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length279 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V7900 5.41
RTX 5090 93.13
+1621%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V7900 2264
Samples: 81
RTX 5090 38985
+1622%
Samples: 11147

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14227
+1792%
1440p10−12189
+1790%
4K8−9
−94.5%
145

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.81
1440pno data10.58
4Kno data13.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
Resident Evil 4 Remake 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 240−250 240−250
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 240−250 240−250
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 69 69
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450 400−450
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 309 309
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 166 166
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 352 352
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 202 202
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Far Cry 5 304 304
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 160 160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 321 321

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 87 87
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 136 136
Metro Exodus 167 167
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 383 383
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 150−160
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 231 231
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 102 102
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how FirePro V7900 and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 1792% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 1790% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 1713% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.41 93.13
Recency 24 May 2011 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 575 Watt

FirePro V7900 has 74% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 1621% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 4340 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.