GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs FirePro S9050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S9050 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S9050
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
11.69
RTX 3070 Ti
2021, $599
8 GB GDDR6X, 290 Watt
55.24
+373%

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms S9050 by a whopping 373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46851
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.61
Power efficiency4.0514.86
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTahitiGA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2014 (12 years ago)31 May 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17926144
Core clock speed900 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8339.8
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache448 KB6 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length254 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S9050 11.69
RTX 3070 Ti 55.24
+373%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9050 4901
Samples: 2
RTX 3070 Ti 23155
+372%
Samples: 17864

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−81.4%
161
1440p18−2086
+378%
4K12−1457
+375%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.72
1440pno data6.97
4Kno data10.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 350 350
Cyberpunk 2077 178 178
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 130−140
Resident Evil 4 Remake 219 219

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 337 337
Cyberpunk 2077 141 141
Far Cry 5 205 205
Fortnite 250−260 250−260
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 210−220
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 266 266
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 124 124
Dota 2 249 249
Far Cry 5 196 196
Fortnite 250−260 250−260
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 210−220
Grand Theft Auto V 173 173
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 130−140
Metro Exodus 145 145
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294 294
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 113 113
Dota 2 230 230
Far Cry 5 183 183
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 210−220
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140 130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144 144
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 250−260 250−260

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 160 160
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 400−450
Grand Theft Auto V 137 137
Metro Exodus 89 89
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 73 73
Far Cry 5 150 150
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113 113

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 47 47
Grand Theft Auto V 147 147
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
Metro Exodus 56 56
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109 109
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100 95−100
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 35 35
Dota 2 194 194
Far Cry 5 82 82
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how FirePro S9050 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 437% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 378% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 375% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.69 55.24
Recency 7 August 2014 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 290 Watt

FirePro S9050 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 22% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 373% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9050 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S9050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8173 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9050 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.