GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2050 Max-Q 2050 Mobile 2060 Mobile 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Mobile Refresh 2060 SUPER Mobile 2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile 2080 Mobile 2080 Max-Q 2080 Super Max-Q 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.89

RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms S10000 by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
S10000 S10000
RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking477273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency2.2527.49
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)29 January 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×21920
Core clock speed825 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2142.2
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×24.55 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×248
TMUs112 ×2120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache448 KB1.9 MB
L2 Cache768 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×26 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.89
RTX 2060 Max-Q 23.10
+112%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
Samples: 8
RTX 2060 Max-Q 9622
+112%
Samples: 1244

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−130%
92
+130%
1440p18−21
−144%
44
+144%
4K18−20
−133%
42
+133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p89.98no data
1440p199.94no data
4K199.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 81
+0%
81
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how S10000 and RTX 2060 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 130% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 144% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 133% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.89 23.10
Recency 12 November 2012 29 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 2060 Max-Q has a 112% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 1054% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S10000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
W5000 DVI FirePro W5000 DVI
vs
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
W5000 DVI FirePro W5000 DVI
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 7950 Mac Edition Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
GeForce4 MX 440-8x GeForce4 MX 440-8x
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
R9 M380 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
625 OEM Radeon 625 OEM
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 408 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.