Radeon Vega 7 vs ATI FirePro M7740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M7740 with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

ATI M7740
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
1.99

Vega 7 outperforms M7740 by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking948612
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiency2.5611.57
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM97Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2009 (17 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640448
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors826 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate20.8053.20
Floating-point processing power0.832 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3228
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed846 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth54.14 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI M7740 1.99
Vega 7 6.75
+239%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI M7740 6626
Vega 7 17394
+163%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−267%
22
+267%
1440p8−9
−250%
28
+250%
4K5−6
−260%
18
+260%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Palworld 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−460%
28
+460%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−300%
20
+300%
Fortnite 9−10
−600%
63
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−270%
37
+270%
Palworld 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Valorant 35−40
−87.2%
70−75
+87.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−360%
23
+360%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−41.5%
58
+41.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Dota 2 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Fortnite 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−250%
35
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−467%
17
+467%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−333%
13
+333%
Palworld 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−109%
23
+109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−125%
18
+125%
Valorant 35−40
−87.2%
73
+87.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Dota 2 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−62.5%
13
+62.5%
Valorant 35−40
+56%
25
−56%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%
Palworld 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Valorant 14−16
−243%
48
+243%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Palworld 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 10−11
−150%
25
+150%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 10−12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how ATI M7740 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 267% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 250% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 260% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI M7740 is 56% faster.
  • in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Vega 7 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI M7740 performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • Vega 7 performs better in 48 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 6.75
Recency 4 August 2009 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 239% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M7740 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro M7740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3466 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M7740 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.