Radeon Vega 7 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated618
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Power efficiencyno data11.56
ArchitectureRV6xx (2008−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM86GLCezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 January 2009 (17 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120448
Core clock speed680 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors378 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44053.20
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL V5725 and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5725 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V5725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3476 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5725 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.