GeForce GT 230 OEM vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking724not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameHeathrowG92B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (14 years ago)27 April 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0024.00
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs1612
TMUs4048
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s24 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M6000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 74% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6000 or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.