GeForce GT 230 OEM vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameSeymourG92B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)27 April 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16096
Core clock speed750 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00024.00
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs412
TMUs848
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s24 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

GT 230 OEM, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.