GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs ATI FireGL X3-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.92
Power efficiencyno data12.07
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR420GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2004 (22 years ago)27 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 $1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10752
Core clock speed491 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1860 MHz
Number of transistors160 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate5.892625.0
Floating-point processing powerno data40 TFLOPS
ROPs12112
TMUs12336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2004 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 450 Watt

ATI FireGL X3-256 has 689% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X3-256 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3742 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X3-256 or GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.