GRID M60-1Q vs ATI FireGL X3-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.05
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameR420GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2004 (22 years ago)30 August 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed491 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors160 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate5.892150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs1264
TMUs12128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2004 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 225 Watt

ATI FireGL X3-256 has 295% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-1Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and GRID M60-1Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GRID M60-1Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X3-256 or GRID M60-1Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.