Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc Pro A30M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Pro A30M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro A30M by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 405 | 259 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 22.75 | 54.94 |
| Architecture | Xe-HPG (2022−2024) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | DG2-128 | AD107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 August 2022 (4 years ago) | 26 February 2024 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2025 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 | 129.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
−57.9%
|
60−65
+57.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
−68.7%
|
140−150
+68.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
−57.9%
|
60−65
+57.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−56.3%
|
100−105
+56.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
−68.7%
|
140−150
+68.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−63.3%
|
80−85
+63.3%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
−66.7%
|
140−150
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
−66.7%
|
200−210
+66.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 35−40
−57.9%
|
60−65
+57.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−56.3%
|
100−105
+56.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
−68.7%
|
140−150
+68.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
−51.5%
|
300−310
+51.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−63.3%
|
80−85
+63.3%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
−66.7%
|
140−150
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
−60.7%
|
90−95
+60.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
−62.5%
|
65−70
+62.5%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
−66.7%
|
200−210
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−56.3%
|
100−105
+56.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−63.3%
|
80−85
+63.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
−62.5%
|
65−70
+62.5%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 80−85
−66.7%
|
140−150
+66.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−55.2%
|
45−50
+55.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
−63.6%
|
180−190
+63.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30−33
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−67.9%
|
230−240
+67.9%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−66.7%
|
70−75
+66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−66.7%
|
55−60
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−62.2%
|
60−65
+62.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−66.7%
|
35−40
+66.7%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
−66.7%
|
55−60
+66.7%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−63.6%
|
18−20
+63.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
−66.7%
|
45−50
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−63.6%
|
18−20
+63.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−50%
|
30−33
+50%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−64.4%
|
120−130
+64.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−59.1%
|
35−40
+59.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
−60%
|
24−27
+60%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.69 | 24.83 |
| Recency | 8 August 2022 | 26 February 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 69% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A30M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
