Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Arc A770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770
2022, $329
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.95
RX 9060 XT 8 GB
2025, $299
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
47.04
+47.2%

9060 XT 8 GB outperforms A770 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19980
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.1195.47
Power efficiency11.0624.42
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (4 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 103% better value for money than Arc A770.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed2100 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate614.4400.6
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs256128
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3232
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache16 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770 31.95
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 47.04
+47.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13365
Samples: 1835
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 19681
+47.3%
Samples: 1250

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102150−160
+47.1%
1440p5985−90
+44.1%
4K3750−55
+35.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.231.99
+38.2%
1440p5.583.52
+36.9%
4K8.895.98
+32.7%
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 38% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 37% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 33% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 179 260−270
+45.3%
Counter-Strike 2 317 450−500
+42%
Cyberpunk 2077 78 110−120
+41%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 132 190−200
+43.9%
Battlefield 5 110−120 170−180
+44.1%
Counter-Strike 2 270 350−400
+29.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 70 100−105
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 117 170−180
+45.3%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 33 45−50
+36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+45%
Valorant 200−210 290−300
+42.9%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 99 140−150
+41.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120 170−180
+44.1%
Counter-Strike 2 143 210−220
+46.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 400−450
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 61 85−90
+39.3%
Far Cry 5 109 160−170
+46.8%
Far Cry 6 117 170−180
+45.3%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 31 45−50
+45.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 105 150−160
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 113 160−170
+41.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196 280−290
+42.9%
Valorant 200−210 290−300
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 170−180
+44.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 58 85−90
+46.6%
Far Cry 5 104 150−160
+44.2%
Forza Horizon 4 23 30−33
+30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 100−105
+38.9%
Valorant 200−210 290−300
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+42.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90 130−140
+44.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 300−310
+31.6%
Far Cry 6 79 110−120
+39.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 45 65−70
+44.4%
Metro Exodus 71 100−105
+40.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 250−260
+42.9%
Valorant 230−240 300−310
+27.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 120−130
+39.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45 65−70
+44.4%
Far Cry 5 82 120−130
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 15 21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60 85−90
+41.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 120−130
+44.6%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27 35−40
+34.6%
Counter-Strike 2 28 40−45
+42.9%
Far Cry 6 49 70−75
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 48 70−75
+45.8%
Metro Exodus 47 65−70
+38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73 100−105
+37%
Valorant 190−200 280−290
+43.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 75−80
+47.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 50−55
+38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 26 35−40
+34.6%
Far Cry 5 49 70−75
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 8 10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 55−60
+37.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 55−60
+37.5%

This is how Arc A770 and RX 9060 XT 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 44% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.95 47.04
Recency 12 October 2022 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 150 Watt

Arc A770 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 47% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5532 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 500 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.