Arc Pro B390 vs Arc A350M

Place in the ranking	428	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	41.11	22.36
Architecture	Xe-HPG (2022−2024)	Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code name	DG2-128	Panther Lake
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2022 (4 years ago)	27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1536
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	105.6	120.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	24
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	6	12
L1 Cache	1.1 MB	768 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB	16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.9
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.4	1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
1440p	17 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
4K	9 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Far Cry 5	42 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Fortnite	75−80 −68.8%	130−140 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	50 −70%	85−90 +70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −73.5%	85−90 +73.5%
Valorant	110−120 −68.1%	190−200 +68.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	180−190 −62.2%	300−310 +62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Dota 2	62 −61.3%	100−105 +61.3%
Far Cry 5	39 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Fortnite	75−80 −68.8%	130−140 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	47 −70.2%	80−85 +70.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	26 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −73.5%	85−90 +73.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 −62.8%	70−75 +62.8%
Valorant	110−120 −68.1%	190−200 +68.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −50%	18−20 +50%
Dota 2	59 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Far Cry 5	37 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −73.5%	85−90 +73.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Valorant	110−120 −68.1%	190−200 +68.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

75−80
−68.8%

130−140

+68.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	100−105 −70%	170−180 +70%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −60%	16−18 +60%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−105 −70%	170−180 +70%
Valorant	120−130 −66.7%	210−220 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Far Cry 5	25 −60%	40−45 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

−72.4%

50−55
+72.4%

4K
High

Atomic Heart	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	11 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −60%	24−27 +60%
Valorant	60−65 −71.9%	110−120 +71.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Dota 2	45−50 −73.5%	85−90 +73.5%
Far Cry 5	12 −50%	18−20 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

12−14

−61.5%

21−24
+61.5%

This is how Arc A350M and Arc Pro B390 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B390 is 67% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro B390 is 59% faster in 1440p
Arc Pro B390 is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.28	23.11
Recency	30 March 2022	27 January 2026
Chip lithography	6 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	80 Watt

Arc A350M has 220% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B390, on the other hand, has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.